Our story began in 2002
Our Global Locations
GlowTouch in the News
Putting People First
Ensuring Security for You and Your Customers
Our story began in 2002
Our Global Locations
GlowTouch in the News
Putting People First
Ensuring Security for You and Your Customers
Effective testing is key to a successful project. However, tech teams know that managing and running tests manually can be a drain on time and money. This is why many organizations are choosing to utilize automated testing in order to maximize efficiency and make the best use of limited resources. A test automation plan that is well-planned and executed completely is an ideal way for teams to focus on new features of a project rather than managing existing ones. Some factors that influence whether a project requires manual or automated testing includes budget, timeline, expertise and project specifications. Of course, the goal for any project is to deliver a quality product in a timely, cost-effective manner. Automated testing can help your team do just that.
“Because human error occurs more frequently with manual testing, automation maximizes efficiency and streamlines projects for success.” #TestAutomation Click To Tweet
There are several reasons why tech teams transition to automated testing for projects. Test automation allows teams to use software in order to execute tests and report results. Because human error occurs more frequently with manual testing, automation maximizes efficiency and streamlines projects for success. Manual testing is also time-consuming, taking up more of your team’s attention during work hours. It is most practical when test cases are run only a few times without frequent repetition. In general, automated testing is more reliable because it is performed by tools and scripts. This also means that automation is much faster than manual methods. Especially when your team plans to run the same tests many times over, automation can often be more efficient.
There are certain scenarios in which manual testing is preferable, however. For example, it makes sense to test manually during exploratory testing. Exploratory testing requires the tester to have specific knowledge and experience to carry it out successfully. These tests require little specification documentation and may need to be executed in a very short time frame. Manual testing is also the way to go for usability tests. These tests measure user experience so human observation is the most important factor. Finally, manual testing is ideal for ad-hoc testing, an unplanned approach to testing in which “the understanding and insight of the tester is the only important factor,” according to Apica.
In other testing situations, automation is the better choice. Automated testing is preferable when you are performing regression tests because the code changes frequently and your team can run regressions quickly. In addition, load testing is particularly well-suited to automation. Performance testing, which requires the simulation of thousands of concurrent users, always requires automation because of the volume of tests being run at once.
When your team is ready to make the move to automation, the following steps are a good way to get started:
Learn more about the testing services offered by GlowTouch. For more information, email us at info@glowtouch.com
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.